![]() ![]() The Gitlow v New York case is paramount in showing how slander against the government played a role in the prosecution of individuals. The effects of the Amendment played a critical role in the decisions of the case especially when it came to the aspect of free speech versus propaganda. The aspect of free speech in the 1920s led to the rise in the cases that restricted the people from practicing their civil rights. ![]() Nebraska case, the right to free speech based on the Fourteenth Amendment can be noted in the court’s decision to strike down the ban on foreign language instruction in schools. The observation of civil rights was also a major factor that played a role in the court cases presented. The need to change the operations of the law played a critical role in the restructuring of the court system that was set in place. ![]() The decisionachieved in the case indicated a trend in the law on how the past behaviors of individuals affected the prosecution when it came to cases. Some of the factors played a significant role in the ruling that was made in the case. Based on the analysis of the past behavior, the two individuals were judged based on their lack of social responsibility to the community and lack of respect for authority. Johnson (2003) states that the assessment of the guilt of the two individuals indicates the innocence or guilt of the individuals was based on the past characters of the individuals. The aspect of race played a critical role in the decisions that were made in the cases and affected the overall delivery of justice to the people. The lack of investigations played a major role in the decision that was made to prosecute the individuals. The effectiveness of the witness statements presented various controversial issues in the testimonies that they gave. Some of the witnesses produced by the prosecution offered different accounts, especially in the descriptions of the accused. ![]() The controversy in the case can be noted through the systems that were submitted in the case. In the assessment of the court case, it can be noted that some of the facts that were presented were based on circumstantial evidence. One of the notable trails in the 1920s was the Sacco-Vanzetti case where the two were convicted of murder during an armed robbery. This paper will evaluate the court cases in the 1920s based on how some of the cases were handled. There were various factors that led to the court decisions made, which affected the operations of the courts. The analysis of the cases showed the different rulings concerning the way the cases were handled, which affected the set laws in the different states. Prior the 1930s, the government played a small role in the creation of a unified court system, which needed to show coordination in the system. The evaluation of the cases in the court system in the 1920s indicated that there was a need for the system to be revolutionized as there was no construct system in place. Based on the limited travel means, the court system was mainly based on the jurisdictions set within the state lines. The court cases that happened in the 1920s were mainly based on the federal policies that had been set. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |